@Article{CrouzeillesBMFPBLLGCMRLS:2020:AcCoLa,
author = "Crouzeilles, Renato and Beyer, Hawthorne L. and Monteiro, Lara M.
and Feltran-Barbieri, Rafael and Pess{\^o}a, Ana Carolina Moreira
and Barros, Felipe S. M. and Lindenmayer, David B. and Lino, Eric
D. S. M. and Grelle, Carlos E. V. and Chazdon, Robin L. and
Matsumoto, Marcelo and Rosa, Marcos and Latawiec, Agnieszka E. and
Strassburg, Bernardo B. N.",
affiliation = "{International Institute for Sustainability} and {Global Change
InstituteUniversity of Queensland} and {International Institute
for Sustainability} and {World Resources Institute} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {International
Institute for Sustainability} and {Australian National University}
and {International Institute for Sustainability} and {Universidade
Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)} and {International Institute for
Sustainability} and {World Resources Institute} and {Universidade
de S{\~a}o Paulo (USP)} and {International Institute for
Sustainability} and {International Institute for Sustainability}",
title = "Achieving cost-effective landscape-scale forest restoration
through targeted natural regeneration",
journal = "Conservation Letters",
year = "2020",
volume = "12",
pages = "e12709",
note = "{Pr{\^e}mio CAPES Elsevier 2023 - ODS 15: Vida terrestre}",
keywords = "assisted regeneration, conservation planning, restoration targets,
tree planting, tropical and subtropical forests.",
abstract = "High costs of tree planting are a barrier to meeting global forest
restoration targets. Natural forest regeneration is more
cost-effective than tree planting, but its potential to foster
restoration at scale is poorly understood. We predict, map, and
quantify natural regeneration potential within 75.5 M ha of
deforested lands in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Of 34.1 M ha
(26.4%) of current forest cover, 2.7 M ha (8.0%) regenerated
naturally from 1996 to 2015. We estimate that another 2.8 M ha
could naturally regenerate by 2035, and a further 18.8 M ha could
be restored using assisted regeneration methods, thereby reducing
implementation costs by US\$ 90.6 billion (77%) compared to tree
planting. These restored forests could sequester 2.3 GtCO2 of
carbon, reduce the mean number of expected species at risk of
extinction by 63.4, and reduce fragmentation by 44% compared to
current levels. Natural regeneration planning is key for achieving
cost-effective large-scale restoration.",
doi = "10.1111/conl.12709",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/conl.12709",
issn = "1755-263X",
label = "lattes: 9352090361680792 5 CrouzeillesBMFPBLLGCMRLS:2020:AcCoLa",
language = "en",
targetfile = "crouzeiles_archieving.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "28 abr. 2024"
}